![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
Conformity: Going Along To Get Along Social psychologists have long studied the many ways that groups exert pressures on members to conform. Conformity <glossary term> occurs when people change their behaviors or beliefs in response to real or imagined group pressure. Often we are genuinely uncertain about the accuracy or correctness of our own behavior. Or, we go along with the group simply out of our desire to be "right." Groups are said to exert informational influence on us when we use the opinions or actions of others as source of information, a guide to the "best" thing to do or say in an unfamiliar situation <Ref>(Deutsch and Gerard, 1955).
While informational influence explains many situations where people conform, what happens when the "correct" response is clear? Will individuals go along with the judgments of other group members even if the others were clearly, unambiguously wrong? The social psychologist Solomon Asch addressed this question in a series of studies conducted in the 1950s. In the Asch <REF> (1955) procedure, participants briefly examine a card with a line drawn on it (see illustration), and then are shown a second card displaying three lines of different lengths (see illustration). From the three choices, they are then asked to choose the line that is the same length as the one seen on the first card. As you can see, for persons with normal eyesight, this should be a fairly easy choice to make. In fact, in this task people are able to correctly select the right line more than 95% of the time. But what if a majority of the people around you are apparently making the "wrong"choice? ![]() Imagine that you have volunteered to participate in a psychology
experiment that you are told is a study of perception. You enter
a room with seven other students and sit down with them around
a large table. In Asch's experimental procedure, the other seven people in the room with you would actually be his assistants, pretending to be test subjects like yourself. These assistants, also called confederates, would be instructed ahead of time to intentionally give a false answer on some of the line judgments. As you were the only real subject in the experiment, it would be arranged that you would always end up giving your answer only after hearing what the others had to say. Even with a very easy and unambiguous decision to make, Asch found that the real participants caved in and publicly stated an incorrect answer about 35% of the time and 76% of the participants gave the popular (but clearly incorrect) answer at least once. A number of factors that are likely to increase conformity pressures have been identified by social psychologists, including group size, stress, group cohesiveness, unanimity, and self-confidence. |
||||||||||||