![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
Social schemas
Social schemas are important because they help solve two problems. First, as the circus example demonstrates, they help to fill in when information is missing. Even though you may not have seen an elephant in town, you can still infer their presence if you know a circus is in town. Similarly, you might infer that the cell-phone-wielding BMW driver is impatient based upon the schemas you have developed for different types of people.
Schemas are important because they shape perceptions. Imagine, for example, that you and a friend hear about a person who is crying. If you believe that she just won the lottery, while your friend believes that she just lost a loved one, then you will form very different impressions of her. Your schematic understanding of the situation will lead you to interpret her tears as tears of joy, while your friend's understanding will lead him to interpret her tears as tears of grief <REF> (D. T. Miller 19xx). Empirical demonstrations of the power that schemas have to shape perception range from the amusing to the profound. In <REF>1954, Hastorf and Cantril showed Princeton and Dartmouth students films of a particularly nasty football game between their two teams. Their task was simply to count the number of rule infractions committed by each team. Presumably, the schemas that the students held at the time would lead them to anticipate cheating on the part of their opponents, and honorable behavior on the part of their fellow classmates. Consistent with this analysis, students from the two schools saw their opponents commit more infractions than their classmates. |
||||||||||||